Alaska 95.1% vs Arkansas 64.1% cases with orders

PlainChildSupport's enforcement data shows a 31 percentage-point gap between the best and worst US jurisdictions on share of Title IV-D caseload with a support order established (OCSS Table P-64).

Research period: · OCSS FY2023 Table P-64 - 51 jurisdictions in current dataset

Research Question

Among the 51 US jurisdictions with published OCSS cases-with-orders rates, which sit at the top and bottom of the distribution, and how wide is the gap?

Methodology

We queried PlainChildSupport's states table for enforcement_orders_pct, populated from the OCSS FY2023 preliminary report Table P-64 (cases with support orders). We ranked all 51 reporting jurisdictions and reported the top 5 and bottom 5. We do not use enforcement_collection_rate: that column is NULL for every row because the preliminary report publishes no honest per-state collection-rate figure we can parse, and earlier hand-typed values were removed.

Findings

Alaska leads at 95.1% - the top of a 31-point spread

PlainChildSupport's states table lists Alaska's cases-with-orders share at 95.1% (OCSS Table P-64), the highest value across 51 jurisdictions.HHS Office of Child Support Services, FY2023 Preliminary Report, Table P-64 The top five:

  • Alaska: 95.1% of caseload has a support order
  • Maine: 94.8% of caseload has a support order
  • Wyoming: 94.8% of caseload has a support order
  • Connecticut: 94.4% of caseload has a support order
  • Iowa: 94.1% of caseload has a support order

Alaska's position creates a 31-point spread to Arkansas at the bottom of the same column.HHS Office of Child Support Services, FY2023 Preliminary Report, Table P-64 Alaska child support guidelines and the orders-coverage ranking use this same population.

The bottom of the distribution: Arkansas at 64.1%

Arkansas anchors the states table at 64.1% cases with orders, the minimum across 51 jurisdictions.HHS Office of Child Support Services, FY2023 Preliminary Report, Table P-64 The bottom five:

  • Arkansas: 64.1% of caseload has a support order
  • Rhode Island: 73.9% of caseload has a support order
  • Delaware: 76.4% of caseload has a support order
  • Michigan: 76.9% of caseload has a support order
  • District of Columbia: 76.9% of caseload has a support order

Arkansas child support guidelines and the full 51-jurisdiction directory expose the same enforcement_orders_pct column used here. Distributed collections (Table P-4) and caseloads (Table P-52) remain available on each state page; they are not mixed into this rate.

What this page no longer does: invent a per-state "collection rate." Earlier drafts cited Iowa 68.4% and Mississippi 49.3% from a hand-typed column. That column is gone, and empty charts beside those claims were the coupling tell.

What this analysis cannot tell us

Cases-with-orders measures the share of the IV-D caseload that has an enforceable support order on file, not dollars collected ÷ dollars owed. A lower share can reflect stricter case-counting or a larger share of cases still awaiting establishment, not only weaker enforcement. The FY2023 preliminary figures are subject to revision. This page deliberately does not publish a per-state collection rate.

Sources

Top 5 states by share of caseload with a support order

Alaska95.1Maine94.8Wyoming94.8Connecticut94.4Iowa94.1

Bottom 5 states by share of caseload with a support order

Arkansas64.1Rhode Island73.9Delaware76.4Michigan76.9District of Columbia76.9

Every figure on PlainChildSupport is rendered directly from official state guidelines and federal enforcement data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on official state guidelines and federal enforcement data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainChildSupport publishes state guideline data and federal enforcement statistics for informational purposes only. It is not legal or financial advice, a calculator result is not an order, and every state allows deviations a court decides case by case, so confirm any figure with the state child-support agency or an attorney before you rely on it. Appropriate use.